Number Resource Society
WHAT IS A MULTI-STAKEHOLDER APPROACH TO INTERNET GOVERNANCE?
Do you own your IP address? This question has been a subject of much debate over the years. Ultimately, the answer to this question depends on how Internet governance is shaped. Since the Internet was developed in the United States, the US retains a huge influence on how it should be governed. In 2005, the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) suggested that the US relinquish their outsized influence on Internet governance. To take its place would be a UN body that represents a more div...
On this page
Do you own your IP address? This question has been a subject of much debate over the years. Ultimately, the answer to this question depends on how Internet governance is shaped.
Since the Internet was developed in the United States, the US retains a huge influence on how it should be governed. In 2005, the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) suggested that the US relinquish their outsized influence on Internet governance. To take its place would be a UN body that represents a more diverse viewpoint.
But instead of pitting one big entity against another, there is a different approach to defining Internet governance: one in which all voices and rights are represented, including your right to own your IP address. It is the multi-stakeholder approach to Internet governance.

Illustration from the original NRS article.
A Brief Overview of the Multistakeholder Approach
Traditionally, Internet governance was primarily overseen by governments and intergovernmental organizations. However, the multistakeholder approach recognizes that other groups should have a say in shaping Internet policies. These groups include civil society organizations, the private sector, technical experts, academia, and individual users.
Since 2005, the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) and numerous international organizations have endorsed the multistakeholder approach for Internet governance.
Instead of being a collection of rules, the multistakeholder approach is a set of practices that individuals and organizations can follow to create strategies and policies that enhance Internet governance.
Principles for Internet Governance
To ensure the multistakeholder approach remains effective in our interconnected world, we need to understand its key attributes. The Internet Society has identified these attributes, which enhance organizations' ways of working and their ability to address complex, cross-border Internet issues. The sectors that are included in this model are: the government, private sector, technical community, academic community, and civic society.
The following are characteristics of Internet governance that follows a multi-stakeholder approach:
Open and participative
Decisions are made only when the widest consensus of voices is heard.
Distributed and collaborative
Stakeholders from different sectors and geographical regions are given a chance to express their voice.
Transparent and accountable
Decisions are made using a bottom-up approach, so that the stakeholders that are most affected have the biggest influence.
Equal and equitable
Stakeholders, especially in economically disadvantaged areas, are given a chance to participate. Ultimately, this inclusion will create more opportunities for social inclusion through high-quality access to the Internet.
By using the multistakeholder approach, we can address a wide range of issues that:
- Impact diverse stakeholders
- Involve overlapping rights and responsibilities
- Require different expertise
- Rely on legitimate and accepted decisions for implementation.
If these principles sound familiar, it's because they are nothing new. These are the same principles that created the Internet as it is today: a fair, open, and all-accepting drive towards collaboration.
The aim is to ensure a wide range of viewpoints are considered and that decisions are made collectively, reflecting the interests and concerns of different stakeholders.
NRS advocates for a world where you can have the right to own your IP address. A multistakeholder approach is one way to reach this goal. You are, as an individual, an integral part of Internet governance. Let your voice be heard in the policies that shape the Internet.
The people running networks must shape their rules
NRS stands for Internet governance that answers to the people who build networks, invest in them and depend on them. Resource holders need a decisive voice in the rules that shape their future.
IP addresses and autonomous system numbers underpin your network and its connections. Whether you hold resources directly or obtain addresses from a provider, changes can mean migrations, customer reconfiguration and lost revenue. Map your registration, supply and routing dependencies, then bring that operational reality into the decisions that affect your business.
Internet governance has grown through technical cooperation, private initiative and public debate. The 2005 Tunis outcome supported multistakeholder participation and the Internet Governance Forum as a place for dialogue. NRS calls on operators to turn participation into influence: bring your experience to discussions and pursue change through the institutions that set policy and elect their leadership.
We advocate genuine ownership rights for IP resource holders. Those who invest in networks and bear the consequences of registry decisions should have the power to challenge those decisions and shape better rules. Participation must strengthen their voice and make institutions answerable to them.
Original NRS article · Internet Society: experience at the IGF · Why the multistakeholder approach works · ICT policymaking in the Philippines · NRS · ITU: Tunis 2005 outcome · APNIC policy development process
Bring your network’s voice into the decisions
Find your institution in the directory of the five RIRs, then check your resource records and provider agreement. Use the policy links to join discussions and develop proposals; use the election links to check how your organisation can participate.
AFRINIC: Policy discussion and proposals · AFRINIC: Elections and eligibility
APNIC: Policy discussion and proposals · APNIC: Elections and eligibility
ARIN: Policy discussion and proposals · ARIN: Elections and eligibility
LACNIC: Policy discussion and proposals · LACNIC: Elections and eligibility
RIPE / RIPE NCC: Policy discussion and proposals · RIPE / RIPE NCC: Elections and eligibility
Choose a proposal that affects your network and contribute your operational experience. For elections, check the role, timetable, eligibility and representative arrangements on the institution’s election page so you can prepare for the relevant ballot.
Explore the influence of RIRs and our current actions. With NRS Shield, turn concerns about your resources into collective action. If you want NRS to represent you, start with POA and representation: you decide whether to grant a mandate, which matters it covers, its scope and duration, and how to withdraw it. Bring your voice to policy debates and eligible elections, and join us in shaping the rules your network depends on.
